Skip navigation

European Conference Blog 2007

7 Posts tagged with the satmetrix tag
1

Part 1: Leaping into the Net Promoter Domain

 

 

I am writing this blog on the plane ride home from the Net Promoter Conference in London. As I ponder the success stories I heard at the conference - stories from GE Real Estate, Aggreko, Philips, Groupe Neuf Cegetel, and other prominent firms - it occurs to me how critical Net Promoter has become for these businesses. Many attendees who were "on the fence" at the outset of the conference have jumped over to join the Net Promoter community. Success is contagious.

 

I'll give you a few examples. GE Real Estate has nearly doubled its revenue since implementing its Net Promoter program. The loan-processing giant attributes 25 percent of these revenue gains to Net Promoter - to the tune of $3.4 billion. Meanwhile, Net Promoter is helping broadband supplier Groupe Neuf Cegetel become a leader in member satisfaction by monitoring customer activity in its call centers. For LEGO Group, success with Net Promoter is all about business transformation and brand revitalization. FileNet (now IBM Enterprise Content Management) reported a 26 percent improvement in its Net Promoter score, accompanied by an increase in revenue from its existing customers. According to its case study, FileNet's sales from existing customers have jumped from 72 percent to 80 percent, yielding an increased net profit of 10 percent. In addition, Philips revealed how it is out-growing competitors in segments where Philips is the Net Promoter leader.

 

What do these companies have in common? They all credit Net Promoter for managing and improving customer experiences. Their employees understand the value of building a network of promoters. They know that having "net-positive" promoters is good in the same way as net profits: it's a currency that drives growth. Thus these companies measure success not only in monetary terms, but in the goodwill of their customers. Finally, they have a reliable metric to track their progress.

 

 

The companies who presented their stories in London realize the value of a reliable customer metric just as CFOs understand the value of business metrics like cash balances, days sales outstanding (DSO), and gross margins. These are tried-and-true financial metrics, just as Net Promoter is quickly becoming a tried and true customer metric. While skeptics insist that simple loyalty metrics can't possibly tell the whole story, these companies are proving them wrong. Balancing Net Profits against Net Promoters is the right way to maximize growth. The rewards are evident for those organizations that are willing to follow the Net Promoter journey—and really listen to customers along the way.

 

 

There is another reason why this is not just important, but essential. There is a huge cultural change happening between customers and businesses. Your customers are talking about you, and this time they have megaphones. Blogs, wikis, RSS feeds, podcasts, and other forms of social networking are growing in popularity, amplifying the voices of individual consumers and business partners. Frustrated letters to the CEO and phone calls to the support department are now being played out on You Tube. The suggestion box on the CEO's door is now being posted on the Web.

 

 

Do you know what your customers are saying, and are you interested in monitoring their feedback? These public expressions are influencing opinion whether you know it or not. Facebook claims 90 percent of the student population in the U.S., which represents an increasingly affluent purchasing demographic. MySpace has 57 million members from all walks of life. People think twice when they see a 2-star score on eBay or Amazon.

 

 

As Richard Owen, CEO of Satmetrix, the co-developer of Net Promoter, stated during his opening presentation in London, what's at stake here is nothing less than the reinvention of marketing. I found it prophetic that New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman wrote about this topic the same day of Richard's talk. As he put it, we're all public figures now. The blogosphere has made the global discussion so much richer - and each of us so much more transparent. He was referring to public figures when he made that statement, but the same phenomenon applies to companies. Whether you're selling cars or newspapers, Friedman reported, it's essential to get your "hows" right: how you build trust, how you collaborate, how you lead, and how you say you're sorry.

 

Companies that embrace customer experience will be rewarded with a loyal group of promoters who do free advertising, just like Apple has been rewarded by its loyal group of iPod customers. Those who do not embrace customer experience will be forgotten. (Which company first released an MP3 player anyway?)

 

 

Net Promoter helps you get your arms around customer experience, in the same way Net Profit focuses your company on profitability. Are you still on the fence? If so it's time to make the leap.

1

Are there economic benefits for Net Promoter? Yes, according to Satmetrix's Dr. Laura Brooks, one of the co-developers of Net Promoter. So what is the economics of Net Promoter?


Well, first, there is measurable economic impact from promoters as well as detractors. Straight to the punch line: On average, the relative economic impact of promoters who recommend is that they bring in additional $565 in revenue and while detractors are responsible for $701 in lost revenue. This is from a sample of B2B software companies. This data was calculated by understanding the number of referrals or negative comments these folks gave.

 

So promoters bring in more revenue through word of mouth marketing, but they are also a driver of revenue growth while detractors are drivers of lower growth. No surprise here. In addition, promoters total value is much more then detractors. Again, no surprise. What I found most interesting with all these benefits of promoters – they are also have a lower cost to serve. So they cost less and are more filling!


Laura talked about important to amplify promoter community through customer testimonials, inner circles, and special communities to further cement the relationship. While there is a lot of attention given to detractors by most customers it is the smart companies are also figuring out how to leverage these promoters through the power of Word of Mouth.


The last word on economics is that committed Net Promoter companies see financial gains. On average, with B2B companies studied, they experienced 23% revenue growth over a 3 year time frame, with an average 9% gain in Net Promoter.


What I wonder, with data like this, why aren’t all companies using Net Promoter?

0

The second session was by Satmetrix's James Young, Managing Consulting - Europe. James discussed goal setting and best practices for actioning business improvement by setting appropriate goals. I think this is a very important topic, and one that I've heard much discussion and debate, especially when wanting to tie compensation to these targets.

 

James believes that having a step-by-step process approach for setting up appropriate goals is critical.  He reiterated that the process should be based on the foundation that had been raised by previous Satmetrix presenters, which contains the 4 main pillars: Executive Foundation, Organizational Alignment, System Infrastructure, and Process Integration.

 

The specific process James reviewed was:

 

  • Set Strategic Direction
  • Capture Customer Experiences
  • Target Value Drivers and Action
  • Leverage Functional Processes
  • Balance Targets and Align Strategy

 

 

James also noted the importance of directly linking goals to drivers of loyalty using statistical techniques. He showed a cascading approach, and used a pyramid diagram to convey the details. At the top of the pyramid was Net Promoter Score (NPS), then it moved to functional level goals, and then event or transactional goals at the bottom. The point I took away from this is that one metric is not enough to truly achieve your objectives. James points out that in order to make improvements across the business you must set goals that are relevant in the various operations in the business. This includes setting goals all the way down to the front line employees. Setting goals on solely on overall aggregated NPS is just not enough.

 

James also talked about how important it is to continue to reevaluate your goals over time. Targets will move. While you may take great care to set initial goals, often times business conditions and priorities change and as a result your goals should reflect these changes. This will more easily allow you to track performance against these goals as they relate to corresponding financial performance. James suggested that setting a periodic review process is an effective way to achieve this.

 

Goal setting is a complex undertaking, but James's structure seems to address the key issues to consider. I really enjoyed this session.

3

The first presentation is by Dr. Vince Nowinski, the Principal Methodologist at Satmetrix (co-developer of Net Promoter). He is the guy who works to maintain sound methodological standards with Satmetrix and based on my observations, it appears he is succeeding. His presentation today is entitled "Measuring What Matters - Capturing the Voice of Your Most Important Customers." Vince's approach to the discussion is to cover the "who," "what," and "when," as it relates to sampling strategies, response rates and general survey design. This is a hotly debated subject and has brought much discussion thus far at the conference.

 

One of the underlying messages from Vince was that getting 'statistical representativeness' of your sample may not be the ultimate goal, especially when considering the differences between B2B versus B2C businesses models. The main takeaway I heard was that when in a B2B environment, particularly when focusing on an enterprise account structure, a census approach is preferred when as compared to a more traditional sampling methodology.  Vince was recommending that you identify your key decision makers and with assistance from your field sales organization, obtain survey responses from 100% of these folks if possible.

 

Vince then discussed the considerations around survey length, and raised the debate between survey design using "the one number..." versus the more traditional approach.  Data was shown around survey length and response rates, and I was very surprised that the difference in response rates between a very short survey and the longer survey was actually very small. Vince's point was that response rates were influenced more strongly by ensuring that the contacts were the most relevant in determining your relationship and the possibility of future business.

 

One last point that I took from Vince's presentation was how each of these 2 survey design philosophies could the impact the ability to determine key drivers. My key takeaway is that using the shorter survey, with perhaps the Recommend question and 1 open ended question, the ability to identify accurate drivers of loyalty becomes difficult. This is because the short survey provides you very few options for analysis.  The only tool you have available is to dive into the verbatim comments and determine qualitatively the key drivers. Using a more in-depth survey design will allow you to use statistical techniques to determine drivers, which to me seems like a more sound approach.

 

I will be interesting to see how this subject evolves over time as we begin seeing some long-standing practices being challenged.

0

In the Net Promoter community, 68% of companies aspire to be customer centric but only 15% achieve this goal based upon research Satmetrix (co-developer of Net Promoter with Fred Reichheld and Bain & Company) recently conducted with over 100 companies in the community. This aspiration is why there is so much interest in the Net Promoter conferences, stated Henry Jones, Satmetrix's Director of Business Consulting, EMEA, in his talk.

 

Companies that exhibit best practices around the Net Promoter discipline see results. In this case, the winners, as he called them, were seeing high NPS with an average 3-year revenue growth of 50%. Their winners were intensely customer-centric, had executive engagement and delivered a superior customer experience. Sleepers did not.

 

The winner companies all scored the highest in the four key areas of the Net Promoter Discipline and Satmetrix Maturity Assessment Model. This included executive commitment and actions, organizational commitment from all employees, system infrastructure of a trustworthy data collection and delivery system and business process integration.

 

So what are the challenges Henry asks? First, it's getting executives to put their money where their mouth is. CEOs state they are customer centric but still need proof points to act. These proof points are out there as we have seen at the conference and documented in the conference blogs. The next challenge is getting organization to get employees to have the behavior that generates the right customer experience. This is best done by rewarding employees financially who have the right customer-centric behavior.

 

The last point Henry makes is to be sure you have a closed-loop tactical feedback system in place. This is where we get feedback information into the business and act on this in a way so that the customer sees results. There are proof points that show by focusing on the key areas of the discipline, you will get results like IBM, GE, Phillips, Lego and other companies that presented their case studies.

 



0

Richard Owen, CEO of Satmetrix, the co-developer of Net Promoter, kicked off the presentations by talking about Net Promoter and the value to your business. He talked about why Net Promoter is taking off.

 

 

Richard presented four reasons that are driving the adoption of NP:

 

  • Shift to service economies
  • Shortcomings in public accounting
  • The high rate of CRM failure, and
  • The Reinvention of marketing.

 

(And all in 45 minutes)

 

The first big topic that Richard covered is the shift to service economies.

 

richard_owen_at london_07.jpgWhen farmers started to celebrate birthdays for their kids, they used ingredients they had on the farm to make a cake. Eggs, milk, etc. Cost? About 5 cents. As people moved off the farms they went to the store and bought the same ingredients for about a dollar. But people wanted further convenience, so they bought cake mix (about 2 dollars). But more convenience was desired, so they go to the bakery and can pay up to 50 dollars for the same cake containing about 5 cents worth of ingredients – this is the definition of the full-service economy. But this is not the end – parents want a better experience for their kids, so they take their kids to entertainment places with pizza, games and the cake thrown in. Total cost? Over 200 dollars. The point is that advanced nations have moved from manufacturing to an experienced-based economy. Services are where the vast majority of value is being created. This leads to customer experience as a differentiator and why NP is important. The point is that value creation is becoming harder and harder. Operational efficiencies like inventory control are not a source of value creation any more. Long term value creation is now around the customer.

 

The next topic was the shortcomings in public accounting.


Accounting is not sexy. But accounting has profound impact on how a company does business. If customer metrics were as important as financial metrics then CEOs would be held accountable- but they are not. And compensation does drive behavior. In this case, short term profits vs. investing in long-term customer value creation.

 

This is why is NP compelling as it offers an open standard. It is compelling for marketing as well as financial organizations. With NP as an open standard you can optimize your business around financial performance and customer performance.

 

The next topic that Richard covered is the high rate of CRM failure.

 

Companies are spending billions on CRM, but companies do not know anything about their customers. This is because CRM is an inside-out view – what they have bought, when they bought it, etc. NP is a complement to CRM since it provides an outside-in view that is predictive and forward looking.


One of the failures of around CRM is adoption. NP can aid CRM adoption since it provides a valuable tool to your sales team. Just ask any account manager if knowing his Net Promoter scores of his decision makers and influencers for his next big deal would be valuable!

 

The last topic that Richard covered is the Reinvention of Marketing.

 

Advertising is in trouble – he gave the example of Digital Video Recorder ownership having increased to 20% of US households. Of these households, 70% skip commercials. Reaching your customers is getting harder and harder.

 

On the flip side, blogs have taken off. Your customers are talking about you. Wikipedia, RSS, podcasting, etc. are all growing. People want to be heard! What used to be frustrated letters to the CEO and phone calls to support are now being played out on YouTube. The suggestion box on the CEO’s door is now being done in public. These public sources are influencing opinion. Facebook has 90% of the student population in the US, MySpace has 57 million members, networking, open source technology. All of this is Word of Mouth marketing, positive and negative.


Bad PR from these online communities can negate million dollars of marketing spend. Marketing’s response is to spend more on marketing tricks, not on improving the customer experience. If you do not respond by focusing on customer experience you will lose in the end.

 

WOM is taking off and NP is one of the ways to get your arms around this phenomenon. The other point Richard got across is that Marketing does not know the efficiency of their spend. Interesting, since marketing efficiency is going down.

 

All of these things add up to why Net Promoter is taking off. The last reason he gave is that Net Promoter is an open standard. It is this openness that will drive its success at being adopted by a wider community.

0

We are kicking off the Net Promoter Conference here in London at the Park Lane Hotel with introductions from Satmetrix's Martin Green, Managing Director - EMEA. He kicked off the meeting with the one big feedback item from the first NP conference in New York in January: more information about how to implement a successful NP program.

 

Since the theme of this conference is “driving results with the NP Discipline” it is only appropriate to talk about the framework that drives NP results. So what is the NP discipline? There are four main areas:

 

  • Organizational Alignment: gaining alignment and preparing the organization
  • System Infrastructure: building the system infrastructure to support collection and distribution of customer feedback
  • Process Integration: integrating loyalty data into your employees day to day business practices
  • All of this must be build on a foundation of executive sponsorship, setting the tone from the top by truly driving a customer centric culture throughout the organization


But you will be seeing more about this in other blogs about the presentations from the conference.

 

Martin also shared some insights into the Net Promoter community and the conference in general. First, there are over 5000 members registered on the NetPromoter.com web site. At the conference, were again, like New York Net Promoter Conference, more than 200 people from 23 countries with strong representation from the telecom and financial services industries.


Looking at the conference agenda, it looks like it will be exciting. Wish you were here.