Skip navigation

San Francisco Conference Blog 2012

4 Posts tagged with the net tag
0

The first session of Thursday’s “Getting Social” track, chaired by Raj Bhargava of Satmetrix, was “Measuring your Social Net Promoter: Methods and Techniques.”

 

During his morning keynote, Satmetrix CEO Richard Owen announced Satmetrix SparkScore In this session, Dr. Laura Brooks of Satmetrix and Erick Watson of Metavana covered how social media activity can be measured in the context of a Net Promoter program using SparkScore.

 

Dr. Brooks emphasized that survey data (derived from existing Net Promoter program) and social media data may have differences – anchored data (i.e. the data has a Net Promoter score attached at collection vs. unanchored data); structured vs. unstructured; easily tied to CRM data (knowing who the respondent is) vs. not; and so on. However, despite these differences, survey and social actually yield complementary, not conflicting, information – especially if viewed through a common lens. Satmetrix SparkScore is the first product to put social media activity in a Net Promoter context.

 

Erick Watson of Metavana – creator of the sentiment engine that powers SparkScore – provided an overview of how the product works. The engine is focused or “trained” by industry (or “domain” in Metavana’s lingo), first collecting pertinent data through “focused web crawling” from a variety of sources – popular social web sites such as Facebook and LinkedIn, Twitter, and so on. But it can also draw from review sites such as Amazon.com, Yelp, and TripAdvisor, as well as public and private customer communities (peer support and discussion venues).

 

The data is then analyzed and classified, attaching sentiment and polarity (a continuum of scores from very negative to very positive sentiment) to each data point. This sentiment engine is the most accurate available, and its output is coupled with Net Promoter methodology, to calculate a SparkScore, or social Net Promoter score. SparkScore can be calculated by industry, data source, and even individual expression. The engine has been “tuned” so that a SparkScore can be related to survey-based NPS calculations, but may not yield the same score.  Satmetrix and Metavana’s research has developed reliable algorithms across a number of different industries, including airlines, computer software, laptops, printers, hotels and motels, and coffee and tea brands.

 

Dr. Brooks continued the session by presenting more detailed findings from one particular industry: airlines. SparkScore is dynamic (it was calculated daily during the research phase), so it is able to capture the impact of discrete events and occurrences that might be missed in solicited surveys. For example, Dr. Brooks demonstrated how SparkScore reflected immediate impact in social media following Alec Baldwin’s run-in with American Airlines over not turning off the “Words With Friends” game he was playing on a mobile device (he was kicked off the flight). There was an immediate score impact on Twitter (Baldwin’s tweet following the incident was widely retweeted), and a subsequent impact on Facebook following Baldwin’s appearance on Saturday Night Live the weekend following the incident. SparkScore captured this effect in social media for both events (the incident itself and the Saturday Night Live appearance).

 

Dr. Brooks concluded by stressing that SparkScore is not a replacement for survey-based NPS, but rather a powerful complement that brings additional richness and power to a Net Promoter program. SparkScore is dynamic, so it can reflect the immediate impact of events (product introductions, publicity, mergers, and so on). SparkScore can provide detailed insight by source (for example, are Facebook comments different than Amazon reviews?) and theme (service, transactional experience) that provide context and depth to similar information solicited through more traditional channels.

 

In short, SparkScore – the expression of Net Promoter behavior in social media – adds a powerful new tool to the Net Promoter toolbox, one no company should really be without.

1

The Ultimate Question 2.0 is the new platform book behind the whole Net Promoter philosophy. Fred thinks that about 35% of companies today globally are measuring NPS, but less than 5% of companies are using the whole Net Promoter System approach. So there is still a long way to go. Core to Net Promoter is closing the loop at the front line. This is working well on the customer side, but not as well on the employee side. That said, there are still a lot of challenges with implementing a successful Net Promoter system.

 

Today, Fred wanted to chat more about Employee Net Promoter Score (ENPS)...as you cannot have happy customers if your employees are not inspired to do great work. Apple is doing a great job at energizing its employees and making it a great place to work. They survey their employees and ask the Recommend question. They share the results in the store meeting as a group and decide as a team what the top things are that they want to work on to improve the employee experience. Then later they close the loop on the improvements that were made. In addition, they always connect the customer NPS and employee NPS. JetBlue is another leader in terms of ENPS. It is one of the few airlines that is not unionized. Rackspace is focused on delivering outstanding service through passionate employees. Bain is also a great place to work and attracts great people. We shouldn’t separate employee engagement from customer engagement. What makes a great place to work is empowering employees to give a “10” experience to customers as part of a focused team.


Today, employee surveys are where customer surveys used to be...run out of HQ, dense, and run sporadically. In ENPS leaders, they focus on simple surveys and giving focused feedback to the organization so it can improve the employee experience. Employees want to be a valued member that is part of a winning team with an inspiring mission. Key questions to measure the employee experience are “How likely is it that you would recommend our company as a place to work? And “How likely is it you would recommend your team leader as a person to work for?


In summary, Net Promoter is a measure of Greatness...maybe it is a Greatness Positioning System!!

1

Rob started by asking the audience whether their companies have world class NPS scores…better than Apple? The reality is that there is a lot of noise around NPS with executives demanding scores or asking how to treat NPS.

 

There are 4 ways to help leaders understand NPS...Take them back to first principles, work out the loyalty economics for your business, link NPS to growth and take action. Most companies aspire to grow and promise that to shareholders, sometimes up to twice the market in revenue and 4 times the market in profitability. But Bain’s research shows that less than 10% achieve profitable, sustainable growth over 10 years. Those companies in the 10% tend to be loyalty leaders. About 80% of execs think they deliver a superior experience, but only 8% of their customers agree. This delivery gap is what a lot of the Net Promoter work is focused on closing.

 

Rob reminded us how promoters drive growth and lower cost. You need to quantify the value or cost of your promoters and detractors for your business.

 

There are two lenses for NPS...Top down and Bottom up. Top down is more an anonymous view of the marketplace and competition. Whereas bottom up is from measuring the experience your actual customers are having with your brand. The scores can be different, and some companies like Philips are using top-down NPS to set business goals for each business unit. This can allow for an apples- to-apples comparison with competitors. Some tricks to help top-down NPS are to define the relevant competitive set, decide how deep to go, develop organizational involvement and link it to growth. As part of the analysis of the data it is important to compare your results against your competitors to understand the relative gaps. Bain has redone its original analysis that linked NPS to organic growth.It is based on 135 companies and over 225,000 customer responses. The data showed that loyalty leaders outgrow competitors by over 2X. The linkage between NPS and growth is stronger where there is real choice, a mature industry, low switching costs and revenue driven by customer decisions.

 

In summary, to be successful in building a Net Promoter system, you need to have a reliable outcome metric, have a closed loop feedback system and a strategic priority to earn loyalty.

0

Richard took us through a history of Net Promoter. Net Promoter was a revolution when it appeared. It took off because it was a metric that mattered and was tied to financials. More than a metric, it was an action-oriented philosophy…going beyond historical measurement techniques. It was a tool that engaged employees and got them excited. We sometimes forget it was also a great tool for getting insights about the business…when we mined the data from detractors and promoters. We got all this from Net Promoter, and it was a great success.

 

But there were lots of changes--the technology wave started to happen…mass usage of email, huge quantities of data, cloud became a buzzword, CRM came of age, and closed loop processes were implemented on a massive scale. Management started holding employees accountable for customer experience. But 10 years is a long time, and a lot has changed. We are in an interesting age today...

 

LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, etc all scale massively every 60 seconds. But customers in this social environment have a different attitude…they have a manifesto. They want a say, they want to connect with others, they want to communicate openly with you, and they want to do business with ethical companies. Customers are online and mobile...mobile social networking penetration is around 20-35% globally. The power of customer input has grown and is more immediate due to tweeting. The influencers have also changed…they are now people who are followed vs just *rich*. There is also an age divide...youth are uber-connected. There is a rich-poor divide. Now customers shop around and have a higher tendency to switch. Cultural norms are all out of order also. 50% of CRM projects fail. Still only 4% internet commerce. 50% Facebook customers less likely to buy if businesses don’t respond on their Facebook page. So, major disconnect...customers with demands and companies struggling to keep up. There are also lots of ethical problems—example of Tripadvisor with the fixing of ratings, so cannot claim to be independent any more. Now companies need to move to move to a *participation* model of 2-way communication. Social media can be a mechanism for sharing value. There has to be 2 significant mindshifts...NPS has to be faster, in a mobile world. We need to reorient ourselves. We have historically built our internal NPS processes with a Ptolemaic view...the company is driving the agenda and is at the center of all the engagement. But customers want to be the center of the universe...companies need to revolve around customers.

 

Companies are not in control...just like a Fisher Price steering wheel. We need to put customers in the driving seat. Activated promoters will mean we will look at who is actually promoting. These promoters are now an incredible asset...they bring higher lifetime value and more profitable customers. We are going to have to listen to customers when and how they want. We won’t be just concerned about detractors, we need to mobilize promoters. We need to move from structured data to a universe of vast, crazy unstructured data. Structured data must live with the unstructured. Think of structured as the backbone and unstructured as the flesh around the backbone. There has been a lot of work done over the past year figuring out how to link standard NPS with social NPS. Richard thinks this is the best of times for CX professionals. We should be giddy with excitement...there will be a wave of innovation around the field of customer loyalty. We need to all get on board with Net Promoter 2.0!