Welcome, Guest Login Register
loading...
Net Promoter Community > Fred Reichheld's Blog > Tags > nps
 

Fred Reichheld's Blog

3 Posts tagged with the nps tag

The Love Metric

Posted by FredReichheld Aug 18, 2011

Rob Markey and I had the pleasure of speaking with Intuit CEO Brad Smith this week in preparation for our upcoming NPS CEO roundtable. (The roundtable will be taking place in late September, so keep an eye out for video highlights shortly thereafter.) We asked Brad if he could comment on some of the benefits Intuit has achieved with the Net Promoter system. His response warmed our hearts.

 

"In my 25 years of experience in business, I have never seen a more powerful approach.“ Brad explained why it’s so powerful for Intuit: “NPS breaks down the silos and organizational boundaries so everyone can focus on the customer. From the board of directors and external audiences all the way to product engineers and frontline phone reps, NPS helps drive our culture toward our True North. It helps us stay on mission—to be a growth company that improves people’s lives.”

 

Rob and I had read an article in the June 2011 Harvard Business Review by Roger Martin, dean of the University of Toronto’s Rotman School of Management, entitled “The Innovation Catalysts.”

 

Dr. Martin wrote, “Intuit’s transformation arguably began in 2004, with its adoption of the famous Net Promoter Score . . . developed by Fred Reichheld, of Bain & Company.”

 

So we asked Brad if NPS had indeed played a role in Intuit’s accelerated innovation process. Brad replied, “Our product guys have completely embraced Net Promoter, but they don’t usually call it that. They call it the love metric. They use it as a threshold to determine if a product design is good enough. Will customers love it so much that they will recommend it to friends?”

 

I can’t wait to hear more from Brad about the love metric at the September CEO roundtable. In the meantime, I hope readers will visit our website to learn about the other exciting developments that will be taking place around the September 20th launch of our new book, The Ultimate Question 2.0. In particular, I recommend viewing a brand-new three-minute video in which we provide a sneak preview of the book’s contents.

0 Comments Permalink

I live in a suburb west of Boston where people regularly tear down perfectly good four-thousand–square-foot homes. They toss all the waste—wood paneling, flooring, windows, carpets, nails, and the kitchen sink—into the dumpster to be hauled off to the landfill.  They build a brand new eight-thousand-square-foot house in its place. Then, of course, they ostentatiously separate their plastic bottles from the glass and paper on their weekly dump runs. This superficial commitment to environmentally responsible and sustainable practices fairly reeks of irony.


I see something similar in the corporate world. Companies seize on ideals like stewardship and sustainability to burnish their reputation and image through public relations campaigns. Meanwhile their core businesses continue to pollute their surroundings by flushing precious assets and resources down the sewer.


But there’s a deeper issue here as well. With all due respect to the environment, it seems to me that the most precious assets over which a corporation should exhibit good stewardship are the lives of its employees and its customers.


Maybe it’s time to rethink corporate responsibility and return to the fundamental idea that the primary duty of a company is to the lives of the investors, employees, and customers that it touches. Do the company’s actions enrich those lives or diminish them? The Net Promoter system makes it possible to measure this core responsibility. People whose lives have been enriched tend to become promoters. Those whose lives have been diminished typically become detractors.


The overall picture painted by this Net Promoter diagnostic image is not very pretty; promoters barely outnumber detractors in most companies today. Most leaders have learned to interpret their horribly unimpressive Net Promoter scores as a barrier to profitable growth, which is completely true. But there is an even darker interpretation. Let’s put aside the corporate carbon footprint for a moment and consider what the scores imply about the human footprint created by the average company today. It seems to me that companies cannot feel good about any kind of stewardship until they start to demonstrate serious progress on creating more promoters and fewer detractors among their customers and employees—until, that is, they demonstrate a serious commitment to enriching the lives they touch directly.

3 Comments Permalink

Most days of the summer, you will find me walking along Cape Cod’s Shining Sea Bike Path, where the vista over Vineyard Sound inspired the poetry of Katharine Lee Bates, author of the words to “America the Beautiful.” There continues to be something magical about the setting and the way the sea sparkles in the sunlight. This special place also happens to be where I do some of my best thinking. During one walk along the path, it struck me that the only way to really change the way people were treating one another in business was to help change the way they measured success, both organizational and personal. That eventually led to the creation of the Net Promoter System. Granted, there is a long way yet to go, but the progress on NPS over the past few years has been most gratifying. Hundreds of the world’s major companies—and likely many thousands of smaller firms—have begun to measure their success with NPS.

 

And now, as the hips on the rosa rugosa turn a deeper shade of scarlet and the marsh mallow blossoms herald the beginning of the end of summer, I again find myself asking some of those perennial existential questions that seem to come with the season. You know the kind: Why do we exist? What is our purpose? And so on. One particularly thorny one got stuck in my head: Why in heaven’s name did my parents name me Fred?  

Fred. There were no noteworthy relatives on either side of the family by the name of Fred. And I couldn’t think of any particularly famous Freds that might have inspired my parents’ selection. There were no US Presidents by that name. Millard, Grover and Calvin, yes, but no Fred. There weren’t even any vice-presidential Freds, although that group managed to include a Chester, a Hannibal, a Hubert, and a Spiro. In fact, my parents never mentioned any Fred-logic that made sense to me. So I decided I would have to find (or invent) my own explanation. I paced up and down the Shining Sea bike path pondering secret codes and mnemonics that might be hidden within those letters F-R-E-D.  And I am happy to report that I think I found the answer. 

The Net Promoter System is much more than a score. It embodies a philosophy so basic that it can be captured in just four words: Foster Recommendation, Eliminate Detraction. FRED! That must have been it. My parents were magically anticipating the philosophy that would underlie NPS, and that’s why they gave me this otherwise inexplicable name.

OK, so FRED doesn’t scale the poetic heights of purple mountain majesties or alabaster cities. But everybody loves an acronym, and acronyms like LASER (originally Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation) have become part of the language. And doesn’t FRED provide a laser-like focus on a good way to run your business and maybe your life? Someday, perhaps, FRED too will become a popular mnemonic—a reverse acronym if you will—morphing from common name to shorthand for a code of conduct worthy of loyalty. And if organizations continue to adopt this philosophy of FRED, America (and the rest of the world) will indeed be Beautiful.

0 Comments Permalink

Actions