Welcome, Guest Login Register
loading...
Net Promoter Community > Richard's and Laura's Blog > 2009 > February > 09
 
Currently Being Moderated

If word of mouth effects are so powerful, why do do few firms focus on them?


There has been no shortage of research around the power of word of mouth. Most new studies barely add to the body of knowledge, we know by now that consumers are twice as likely to trust the word of a friend, colleague, or just about anyone it seems over the thousands of messages marketers throw at us every day. Companies with favorable word of mouth dynamics, such as Amazon, beat the pants off others who don't have it. Silicon valley startups, like google, build their entire business, and disrupt whole industries with growth driven through word of mouth.


And yet.


Faced with what, on the surface, is a superior business model, marketers are slow to shift gears. A 30 second superbowl add ran $3m this year, a record, while TV viewership pretty much stands still. Studies continue to show a slow allocation of funds to these programs - and that's where companies truly signal their intentions.


Superior business models beating existing models by hiding in plain sight are not new. In the 1990's, Dell trumped Compaq with the direct model and, despite years of falling behind, Compaq found it hard to respond. Southwest's business model for airlines is hardly a secret, yet it's new entrants to the market that mimic it, not existing competitors. You could be forgiven that some firms, illustrated by Circuit City, would go out of business before changing their business model.


In all these instances, firms were handicapped by significant switching costs. In the case of Compaq, reliance on an existing dealership network made the adoption of the direct model difficult. An investment in existing fleet, hub and spoke systems and labor agreements have tied the hands of the aviation industry. Perhaps switching costs explain the challenge marketers have in moving to a superior model?


Skills represent such a switching cost in some firms. Marketing leaders brought up through a world of advertising agencies, TV spend and print media have had to work hard to adjust to a digital, web based world. New media is inherently more risky, if only because returns from traditional marketing - whilst relatively poor - are well understood. Few companies can measure word of mouth, let alone guarantee it's positive generation. Customer communities? Viral marketing? Many companies will stick to what they know - even to the point of failure - because the personal risks are too high to experiment, Startup competitors lack that risk intolerance.


Customer experience is not a traditional discipline within the marketing department, not like marcom. Worse, some see it as an operational issue that transfers ownership of demand creation out of marketing and into the functions that directly deliver the experience.


There is another factor, and one I'm loathe to point out as it's far from a general observations. In some marketing departments, spend equals organizational power. And nothing gets budget like advertising. Spending a small fortune on creative for a superbowl ad is a hoot. Working with smart agency people on a campaign is fun, and the agencies take good care of their clients. Nobody wants this to end.


What should marketers do? First, the firm has to accept - at executive levels - that the model has changed and isn't going back. Once we have accepted that the current model won't work, the relative risks of new models drops. This requires a lot of alignment from the top of the firm, given the already low tenure of CMOs. Then, it's time to gain an understanding of the word of mouth capacity in your firm - NPS will do just nicely. If your capacity is too low due to you falling behind your competitors, the priority resource investments need to be around improving that score to the point that you are enabled to compete. This requires tough, cross department tradeoffs, but it's worth recalling the maxim that "nothing kills a bad product like good advertising".


Getting beyond capacity into actual word of mouth effects happens naturally for loyalty leaders and it's hard to force the issue. I'm a huge fan of creative approach to promoter activation such as those communities at Intuit Turbotax and Lego, but those companies build on already strong story. If you can get into pole position, lots of opportunities present themselves to shift the game in your favor.



Feb 27, 2009 12:39 AM SimonRees-Idiro SimonRees-Idiro    says:

It's a fascinating question.

 

Our business - Idiro - helps mobile / cellular operators do viral marketing by analysing their call records to discover true customer communities.  Our customers can use this insight for viral marketing campaigns, yet most (not all) of our customers struggle to get all the benefit that they could from viral marketing.  In my experience this is because:

 

  • It doesn't work for all marketing propositions - not everything is interesting or important enough to be talked about.  We spend a good bit of time saying 'don't waste your time on that WoM idea'
  • It can be dangerous - negative WoM can be devastating if your proposition isn't good enough (and if a traditional above-the-line campaign fails, the collateral damage is often nil)
  • It's hard to measure by traditional means
  • Most campaigns are created and implemented to a strict timetable, and there's usually no time to work out the extra steps needed for a WoM campaign (It's often 'yes please, but not now' to WoM suggestions!)
  • Target group spillover is a real issue - many people will receive the offer via WoM, and if you need to exclude part of your market / customer base from the offer, that rules out WoM.
  • Finally, many marketing agencies don't have a good grasp of or interest in real (as opposed to fluffy nonsense) WoM or viral marketing skills.

 

Is it the same in other industry sectors?

 

Simon

Apr 3, 2009 10:39 AM Paul_Marsden2 Paul_Marsden2    says:

Richard, smart post, especially in reference to promoter-activation

 

You ask "If Word Of Mouth Is Great, How Come Nobody Invests?"

 

In my experience the simple answer is that you can't invest in word of mouth because it's not a commodity that can be bought or sold.

 

You have to earn word of mouth.  Word of mouth is simply an effect of delivering a remarkable product/service experience, not media you can buy.

 

And it'll always be cheaper to buy an ad that over-sells, than deliver a product or service that sells itself.

 

So we're talking to the wrong people.

 

If word of mouth is not about what you say but about what you do then we're selling to the wrong people - we need to be talking to innovation departments not marketing communication departments.

May 27, 2010 2:24 PM Paul_Sherland Paul_Sherland    says:
Richard’s observations are right on target.  In my experience, it’s very difficult for companies with a marketing/advertising tradition to invest in word of mouth because there’s no organizational home for it.  The marketers are not comfortable with being held accountable for something as difficult to control as a customer experience.  As Richard points out, it’s much easier to plan and execute ad campaigns.  Other traditional company departments don’t have the media expertise to promote word of mouth beyond the neighbors-talking-over-the-back-fence level.

When marketing-focused companies do try to launch word of mouth campaigns, they frame them as traditional advertising using social media channels.  They don’t try to engage with their customers through social media.  The companies say that they don’t want to provide a forum for customers talking about their brands because they don’t want to lose control of their brand message.  It hasn’t dawned on them that they’ve already lost complete control of the brand message.

Dell was shocked into refocusing on its customer experience when Jeff Jarvis touched off the “Dell Sucks” storm.  Today, Dell is a leader in engaging with customers through IdeaStorm.com and a team of bloggers.  Other traditional marketing-focused companies may adopt word of mouth only if forced to do so by a similar social media kick in the pants.

A comment to Paul -- word of mouth can’t be bought but it can be promoted.  If companies ignore social media or if they use it only as a channel for traditional intrusive advertising messages, they will remain ineffective at promoting word of mouth.  However, companies like Zappos, Intuit, Dell, and Amazon that embrace online engagement and social media can and do promote word of mouth.

I work with small businesses and it’s sad, but most of them try to emulate the larger marketing-based companies and ignore the value of spending on word of mouth.  The companies that promote word of mouth through online customer engagement and social media are almost as rare in the small business sector as they are in the Fortune 1000.

Thanks Richard for launching this very interesting discussion!